#VIRGINIA PMP HISTORY UPDATE#
#VIRGINIA PMP HISTORY CODE#

Further, DHP does not seek to add a reference to the newer version since the existing regulatory text already directs dispensers to use a specific file layout, which implicitly reflects the reporting standard. 1 DHP seeks to repeal this language because that specific version has since been superseded by newer versions of the standard. The Department of Health Professions (DHP) seeks to repeal discretionary language that requires dispensers of certain covered substances to use a specific version of a reporting standard when submitting data to the Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP). Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. There are no advantages or disadvantages to this agency or the Commonwealth.ĭepartment of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact Analysis:

There are no disadvantages to the public. The regulatory change will primarily benefit dispensers that currently report under multiple standards. The regulatory action facilitates the ability of dispensers to share this information through their choice of reporting standard, thus facilitating receipt of this information prior to patients receiving prescriptions in the future. Issues: The primary advantage to the public of the PMP is that prescribers and dispensers have access to information on a patient's prescription history, which ensures that prescribers and dispensers can provide safe courses of treatment that are individualized to a patient's particular needs. Substance: Amendments delete language that requires that dispensers report according to a specific version of the ASAP standard.

#VIRGINIA PMP HISTORY CODE#

Provided the data elements specified in § 54.1-2521 of the Code of Virginia and the vendor utilized by the Department of Health Professions (DHP) recognizes the standard, then DHP will recognize it as an acceptable version. Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This regulatory action is expected to be noncontroversial because the director is deleting an outdated standard and allowing more than one standard to be acceptable to dispensers.

Reporting of certain data by dispensers to PMP is not only required by the Code of Virginia but essential to ensure the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens because the PMP is used to track excessive prescribing and dispensing of covered drugs and to alert for possible diversion of such drugs into communities. The goal of this regulatory action is to simplify and facilitate reliable reporting by allowing dispensers more than one standard to use for reporting to the PMP and simplify the reporting process for dispensers located in Virginia or dispensing to Virginia residents by allowing each dispenser to choose either the older Version 4.2 or a different version.

#VIRGINIA PMP HISTORY UPDATE#

Purpose: The purpose of the regulatory change is to update the regulation to allow for newer standards for reporting for the Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) without placing additional burdens on dispensers by specifying the most current version that is the 2019 Version 4b of the American Society of Automation in Pharmacy (ASAP) Standard. Authority for the Director of the Department of Health Professions to establish the PMP is found in § 54.1-2505 of the Code of Virginia. Section 54.1-2521 of the Code of Virginia provides reporting requirements for the program. Public Comment Deadline: February 2, 2022.Īgency Contact: Ralph Orr, Program Manager, Prescription Monitoring Program, Department of Health Professions, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 300, Richmond, VA 23233-1463, telephone (804) 367-4523, FAX (804) 527-4470, or email Regulations governing the Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) are promulgated under the statutory mandate in § 54.1-2520 of the Code of Virginia. Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled. Statutory Authority: § 54.1-2520 of the Code of Virginia.

Regulations Governing the Prescription Monitoring Program (amending 18VAC76-20-40).

Virginia pmp history